Soft Containment in US Policy Towards Syria 1989-2004 (A Historical-Analytical Approach)
Main Article Content
Abstract
With its extremely important geostrategic location and influential regional political influence, Syria has been a constant focus of US foreign policy calculations for decades, dating back to before the end of World War II. Syria's position in the US perspective was strengthened with the emergence of the bipolar international system during the Cold War, when the Levant, with Syria at its heart, became an arena of fierce competition between the United States and the Soviet Union for influence and consolidation of power. As part of its grand strategy to contain Soviet expansion, the United States sought to win Syria over to its side through a package of soft power tools and calculated pressures, including diplomatic means, economic relations, and security signals. However, American policy, with its clear and permanent bias toward Israel, clashed with Syrian national determinants, which viewed this bias as a direct threat to its national security. This prompted Damascus to consolidate its strategic partnership with Moscow—first during the Soviet era, and later with the Russian Federation—as a balancing option in the turbulent regional environment. In this regard, this study aims to analyze the decision-making process in American foreign policy toward Syria during the period extending from 1989 to 2004. This was a highly sensitive period that witnessed radical transformations in the international structure, starting with the collapse of the Soviet Union, through the Second Gulf War, and ending with the repercussions of the September 11 attacks, which reshaped American national security priorities. The study focuses on two main topics: the philosophy of soft containment in American policy toward Syria in light of the regional and international changes that reshaped the balance of power in the Middle East from 1989 to 2004. It then examines the means and tools the United States used to implement this policy, whether through traditional diplomatic channels or economic and legislative pressure tools aimed at containing Syrian influence and restricting its strategic options.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.