Interpretation law Between Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd

Abstract

Writing about Al-Ghazali or Ibn Rushd may be seen as writing on a topic that is more like a consumer
It will not come up with anything new after the large amount of research, letters and books that dealt with them in research and analysis.

However, this view - in fact - overlooks the fact that scientific research is an ongoing research that does not stop at an end
As long as the cognitive mind is a diligent mind, it always searches for something new or for illuminating points that have not been highlighted
As much as you deserve or what you intubate.

The subject of interpretation for both Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd can be said to be one of the proofs of this fact. He is
A research that internalizes a set of facts that are important in the final position of these two sciences, foremost of which is that they are
They are almost identical in the law of interpretation; It is a fact before completing this research, it was a hypothesis for the researcher after
his knowledge of their texts on this subject; And the