Paying Hatred Is A Condition For Accepting The Interpretation of The Interpreter In Grammatical Matters
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research deals with an important party of the interpretation process, which is the third axis of its axes, which is represented by the opinion of the grammatical issues reported by the grammarians, which is the adjustment of pushing hatred, which is related to the pronunciation; that is, the adjustment who deals originally grammatically related to the uprightness and correctness of the pronunciation. The research aims to highlight the controls and criteria under which the opinion of the subject of the grammar issue was accepted. The importance of this research lies in trying to extrolate and root the opinions and grammatical guidelines of the scholars, and not to allow acceptance for every first to be as he wants except with controls that have been humbled by scholars from the predecessors and successors in this art. The study extrapolated and collected all the non-hatemality adjustment mentioned in the grammar code as a condition for accepting grammatical interpretation. The number of what he mentioned to the eloquence officer reached (10) times in various grammatical issues. The research begins with a precamp, then the division of four researches, then a conclusion with the most prominent findings of the study, which is a list of the sources we relied on in this study. The first thesis included (the concept of hatred in language and terminology), and the second research included (the first issue: erecting the source with a deleted verb, and not raising it; the hatred of being carried on the first name that is not in it), while the third thesis dealt with (the second issue: increasing a thousand between the non-feminis and the non-emphasis; the hatred of the non-noun meeting). To solve the fourth thesis, and includes (the third question: the interpretation of replacing (that) instead of [the mother of the oath) if it comes with (if) in our saying: (By God, if I had done it, I would have done it); the hatred of meeting of the two].
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.